+4 votes
132 views
in LGBTQIA Club by
So, I made the mistake of looking up omnisexual on Wikipedia to see if it was accurate.

Problem 1. It just went to pansexual.

Problem 2. It was clearly written by someone who wasn't LGBTQ+ in any way.

Problem 3. One of the resources that was put in there had someone claiming that it was used as another label for bisexual because they said bisexual didn't include people who were trans and/or under the nonbinary spectrum. Bruh. None of that information that was there was true.

Problem 4. There were probably many more, but I got too frustrated to keep reading.

I might make this a series where I just point out inaccuracies in these articles, and I would continue with this article if you want. Tell me if it's a good idea, I guess.



1 Answer

+1 vote
by (915k points)
 
Best answer

1. Wikipedia isn’t exactly the best resource for LGBT+ terms. I use this instead: https://lgbtqia.fandom.com/wiki/Omnisexual?so=search (more accurate)

2. Your post idea is a great idea!

by
I use it, too! Sometimes I use Wikipedia just because I have nothing better to do :p.

:D
by (915k points)
Glad I’m not the only one who constantly uses Wikipedia and always has a Wikipedia tab open.
by
:)



Categories

Related questions

+3 votes
5 answers 27 views
+6 votes
5 answers 70 views

Recent Badges

Popular Question
Asked question received 100 views
- Esie -
Popular Question
Asked question received 100 views
- ThatOneRainbowWorm -
Famous Question
Asked question received 500 views
- 3mely -
Notable Question
Asked question received 50 views
- Thatonekpopfan -
Notable Question
Asked question received 50 views
- -Minecraftnerd- -
...