Okay, so, if I don't know how that's political, then tell me. I'm not the one making it about politics, I was merely making a scientific statement. And if this is political, how are the other posts not, and why am I the only one being picked on?? XD
Is saying legs are for walking and running a political statement?? No. Neither is saying that LQBTQ+ is anatomically correct. I can see where LGBTQ+ is the political part, but just because I added a fact on top of it, that's really all.
Okay, NOW it's going to get a little political XD
Sure, there are a TON of female/male couples that don't choose to have children. There are several, however, that cannot because of infertility on either side (which is very sad). And that last part, is a problem, so it does matter. You forgot to consider the other side of those childless couples. Now, add LQBTQ+ in there- birthrates would significantly drop (and have) even more. Which isn't the end of the world, it's just that it's a bit of a problem.
Um, although we are humans, and we are def a 
special type of species, and although to us, life isn't all about reproducing, nature says otherwise. The whole idea and goal in nature is to reproduce. Even Darwin thinks so in his laws of Natural Selection!! Those who can reproduce and pass on favorable traits are the type who will survive- those who cannot reproduce, or those who do and pass on their unfavorable traits, will become very rare to come across, and may possibly even face extinction in the future.
Your right, Ig- "love is love." But what type of love are we talking about?? I don't love my mum or my friends like I love my bf- but I love them so much, but yk, not in the same way I love him. I think some people of the LGBTQ+ community may be confused as to what love they are actually feeling... You picking up what I'm putting down??
Idek if children should be exposed to LGBTQ+ at a young age... They're not even old enough to know about those things!! So why should they be learning about anything with adult topics in it?? We shouldn't be influencing these kids at such a young age. When they get to be teens, I still don't entirely agree, but fine, they are becoming young adults who can make decisions and think for themselves, so if they would like to become a part of that community, fine!! That's between you and your family, not me. But until we get to that age, kids shouldn't even be exposed to it- there are so many awful things down that road (even in straight culture, thus the reason we don't expose them to ANY of these things when they're young- it'll traumatize them). LGBTQ+ def has a large foundation - why expose children to it??
Anyways, NobodyImportant, I also see where you're coming from!! Still don't agree, but I see your thinking. I'm also not gonna hate or dislike you at all becuase of this!! You expressed your opinion, just as I expressed mine :)
